Comment: I have been thinking about this swap for a while and messaged the swap host asking about the swap requirements before they were changed. So, I found out that it was a type three swap then already and therefore I see no other way than rating a three. It failed the requirements not only for the second version but also for the first. I am sorry, but if you still do not want to resend something I really have to rate you down. It is not my aim here to snub my partners because of knick-knacks, but this is not knick-knacks and an appropriate rating is necessary to beware others of bad swappers. And the apathy you showed in your last message regarding the three rating made kind of clear that you are not interested in making up mishaps and that is no good swap behaviour. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx This is the second message I sent which status is still 'unread'. I really tried communicating with you, but obviously you refuse any contact with me. Anyway, not only that you sent flat mail instead of type 3, the items were chosen very poorly, the best was one half of a sticker sheet. Sorry, but that did definitely NOT make me smile.